As companies using Microsoft Dynamics NAV look toward the future, the migration to Dynamics 365 Business Central (BC) represents a pivotal step toward modernization, cloud readiness, and greater business agility. Yet this transition brings a strategic choice-Greenfield vs Brownfield-each with its implications, costs, and benefits.
In this article, we delve deep into the two approaches, compare them across multiple dimensions, and guide you on how to select the right migration path tailored to your organization’s needs. We also explore INFOC’s proven methodology for ensuring smooth, business-aligned ERP transformation.
Understanding the Migration Landscape
Before we break down the Greenfield and Brownfield approaches, it’s essential to understand why so many businesses are moving from NAV to Business Central:
- End of Mainstream Support: Many NAV versions are out of mainstream support, exposing businesses to risks.
- Cloud Advantage: Business Central is built for the cloud with seamless integration into the Microsoft ecosystem.
- Modern User Experience: Intuitive, role-based interfaces improve productivity.
- Power Platform Integration: Tight integration with Power BI, Power Automate, and Copilot unlocks automation and AI.
- Continuous Updates: Business Central provides biannual updates, keeping you current without major upgrade projects.
With the strategic importance established, the next step is to choose your migration path.
What is a Greenfield Approach?
The Greenfield method involves implementing Business Central as a completely new system. No historical baggage, no legacy structures. It’s a blank canvas that allows you to design business processes from the ground up.
Key Characteristics:
- No migration of historical data or old customizations
- Focused on best practices and standard features
- Ideal for reimagining outdated business processes
Benefits:
- Freedom to Innovate: You’re not bound by legacy constraints. It’s a perfect time to adopt modern workflows.
- Optimized Performance: With clean architecture and minimal technical debt, the system runs faster and scales better.
- Easier Support and Upgrades: Fewer customizations mean better compatibility with new updates.
- Process Standardization: Business Central’s standard features are robust and suitable for most SMB operations.
Challenges:
- Higher Change Management Overhead: End-users need training since processes may change significantly.
- Loss of Data Continuity: Only opening balances or limited historical data may be carried forward.
- Custom Feature Redevelopment: Some NAV customizations may need to be rebuilt using Business Central extensions.
When to Choose Greenfield:
- Your NAV system is heavily customized and difficult to maintain
- You want to overhaul operations or move to a new business model
- Your business is scaling rapidly and needs a future-proof ERP
- You want to leverage Business Central’s cloud-native architecture
What is a Brownfield Approach?
The Brownfield strategy upgrades your existing NAV system to Business Central, retaining customizations, configurations, and full historical data. This approach emphasizes continuity and risk minimization.
Key Characteristics:
- Migrates existing NAV data and custom code
- Follows a technical upgrade path from NAV to BC
- Often staged through intermediate versions depending on NAV version
Benefits:
- Faster Go-Live: Familiar processes and data mean less disruption.
- Lower Initial Cost: Shorter implementation timeline and less training required.
- Preservation of Business Logic: Keeps existing business rules and automation in place.
- Minimal Downtime: With proper testing, cutover can be swift and seamless.
Challenges:
- Legacy Complexity: Older customizations may not align with modern best practices.
- Technical Debt: Some inefficient processes or outdated code may be carried forward.
- Upgrade Constraints: Migration paths from NAV to BC can be complex and version-dependent.
When to Choose Brownfield:
- Your existing NAV system works well and is not heavily customized
- Your team is comfortable with existing workflows
- You want to migrate with minimal disruption
- You have regulatory needs requiring full historical data retention
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | Greenfield | Brownfield |
|---|---|---|
| Approach | Fresh implementation | Upgrade of existing NAV system |
| Data Migration | Only necessary master data and balances | Full historical and transactional data |
| Customization Handling | Rebuild using modern extensions | Migrate and refactor existing code |
| Implementation Time | Longer, transformational | Shorter, familiar processes |
| Training Needs | High-new system and workflows | Low-similar experience |
| Cost Consideration | Higher upfront, lower long-term costs | Lower upfront, potential hidden costs |
| Cloud Readiness | Native SaaS design | Requires optimization for cloud use |
| Risk | Higher risk due to overhaul | Lower risk, incremental changes |
INFOC’s Proven Migration Framework
Whether you choose Greenfield or Brownfield, execution matters. At INFOC, we offer a structured migration framework:
1. Assessment & Readiness Audit
- Analyze existing NAV version and infrastructure
- Review customizations, extensions, and integrations
- Map current pain points and goals
2. Migration Strategy & Planning
- Recommend Greenfield or Brownfield based on ROI and effort
- Design project phases, milestones, and success criteria
- Align stakeholders and prepare change management plan
3. Data & Process Mapping
- For Greenfield: Define new master data structures
- For Brownfield: Design migration pipeline for historical and transactional data
- Conduct data cleansing and mapping exercises
4. Customization & Integration Rebuild
- Rebuild in AL extensions (Greenfield)
- Refactor C/AL code to AL (Brownfield)
- Ensure API, Power Platform, and third-party integration compatibility
5. Testing & Validation
- Conduct unit, system, and UAT testing
- Simulate real-world transactions
- Validate reports, dashboards, and workflows
6. Go-Live & Support
- Prepare users with role-based training
- Cutover strategy: big bang or phased
- Post-Go-Live support, system tuning, and user assistance
Special Considerations in NAV to BC Migration
1. Licensing Model Transition
Business Central uses a named-user subscription model compared to NAV’s perpetual model. We help customers assess user roles and optimize licensing costs.
2. Cloud vs On-Premise Decision
While Business Central SaaS is the default path, INFOC also supports hybrid and on-prem deployments for businesses with specific regulatory or performance needs.
3. ISV and Add-On Compatibility
NAV often relies on ISVs for extended functionality. INFOC ensures your essential add-ons have BC-compatible versions or recommends native replacements.
4. AI & Automation Readiness
Business Central introduces AI-based insights and automation with Copilot and Power Automate. Greenfield projects often take advantage of these from Day 1, but INFOC also layers them into Brownfield upgrades post-migration.
Business Outcomes to Expect
Successful NAV to BC migrations-whether Greenfield or Brownfield-enable:
- Faster decision-making with Power BI & real-time analytics
- Stronger collaboration via Microsoft 365 integration
- Lower IT overhead through SaaS architecture
- Improved compliance with built-in security and audit trails
- Scalable operations across finance, supply chain, and customer service
INFOC customers typically see ROI within 12–18 months.
Ready to Take the Next Step?
The future belongs to organizations that can harness their data to make timely, intelligent decisions. With Microsoft Fabric, every business can:
- Start with a Microsoft Fabric Trial
- Book a Data and AI Discovery Workshop
- See your ERP data in action with a tailored Fabric demo
Greenfield is right if you're aiming for:
- Process transformation
- Cloud-native architecture
- Reduced legacy baggage
Brownfield is ideal if you need:
- Speed, continuity, and minimal disruption
- Retention of historical data and workflows
- Low change management overhead
